A Case for Dueling

 A Case for Dueling 

By Claudia Berdella

I am of the opinion that duels should be brought back. Dueling presents a simple, yet swift and effective method of Lex Talionis, in which both (or more) parties of a given situation can work out a dispute. 


To have a duel, the involved parties would need tot get into a contract, laying out the details and set up of the duel; location, weapons (or lack thereof) used, time, and such things. Of course, the duel would have certain limitations pertaining to things like weaponry used, atomically are clearly off the table as they only insure a never ending standoff, to which if it ever ended uninvolved parties would be negatively affected for years to come. Likewise, location would also be limited in some aspects, obviously there would be no duels allowed to be conducted on any sort of school grounds- no duels would be beneficial at a preschool. Age limitations would also be imposed as it would be impractical to allow second graders to butcher their peers, leave it to abortion and contraceptives to thin out the population; so the minimum age for duels would be 18, with small leeway for 17 years and emancipated. 


Duels wouldn’t be the end all with death, if one yields, the duel is over and they have forfeited their end of whatever the conflict at hand would be and was contractually decided upon. A contract is enacted whenever a duel is planned, it is carefully negotiated and designed by (at least) three lawyers: two lawyers to represent the two people, and one unbiased one to fix and settle any disputes between parties on or with the contract. 


Duels would not be to settle everyday, petty disputes, if an issue like that occurs, there are numerous simple solutions to get through that without murdering each other, and a duel would be counterproductive in the long run. A duel would be a force for self-governance without the need for the involvement of law enforcement. 


  • that is my own rambling on a hypothetical way to instate dueling into the system, none of it is set in stone; it is assumption based on assumption. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trouble-making, Symbols, Sounds, Experiments

Hebrew, Not Christian

The Bottom Feeders Frenzy