Yesterday I decided to watch the MKUltra hearing from the House Oversight Committee, wherein the stated and supposed goal is to find the truth and prevent such experimentation from proceeding from occurring again. In hindsight as well as while viewing the testimonies from the likes of Tom O'Neill— who, as much as I don't quite find to be a reliable source of information per se, namely when it comes to the case of Charles Manson specifically, where say, Nikolas Schreck in my mind fills in more gaps in a way which makes more sense and to a conclusion I find more probable even though there really never will be such; resulted in me taking a venture out to Barnes & Nobles real quick to grab a copy of his book CHAOS regarding the quite questionable reasoning stated behind the prosecution in the cases of the Tate-LaBianca killings— another man with greyish/white hair and a nice moustache, as well as a woman who was formerly employed by the National Institute of Health and spoke on medicine and vaccine funding in regards to Ebola and COVID.
Speaking to the apparent dismay of the Committee, but as it would seem by the line of questioning which followed about the public shift in opinion in the wake of more information regarding Anthony Fauci's role in the plausible construction of the coronavirus strain which shut down the country in 2020 and 2021; leading me to think her inclusion in the hearing was not a mistake at all.
With that, it is my view that the procedure was as much of a sham-show as the Manson trial was. Serving as merely a bait and switch for confirmation bias'. What was explained and explored on the topic of MKUltra was neither new or groundbreaking information, all which was stated is facts known for years and easily learned via a quick search on the internet about the topic of United States intelligence apparatus experimentation; and somehow neglecting to mention the probability that Theodore J. Kaczynski or The Unabomber was a subject of such abuses. With that and in conjunction with the inclusion of the woman from the NIH, it would seem the real underlying point in the whole hearing was primarily to pry at COVID mandates as well as how it could have been a similar enactment of such experimentation en mass, especially with the vaccines which came out for the possibly Wuhan-lab-manufactured pandemic. Where it would have any relevancy to current events aside from that is in the brief inquiry on online radicalisation in regard to the cases of Tyler Robinson and Thomas Crooks, the former being Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin and latter the one whose shot grazed Donald Trump's ear during the 2024 reelection campaign; and how possibly MKUltra's tactics updated with the times and shifted into the online sphere. In a way it would be comparable to Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald... or maybe it was Number Five Hargreeves all along...
